| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | Principales períodos estratégicos (medidos entre los años de máximo del ciclo más cercano al inicio y término del período) (*) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | Período Oligárquico (anterior a 1924) (Cifras se miden de 1884 a 1929) | Santa María, Balmaceda, Alessandri Palma | 4,228,169 | 1.2% | 2,151,501 | 0.9% | 51% | -0.2% | -0.3% | 2,075,874 | 1.6% | 1,058,311 | 2.4% | 25.0% | 692,997 | 2.9% | 16.4% | 1,442,060_ € | 0.8% | 1.2% | -0.4% | 0.6% | 1.7% | -0.1% | 1.6% | 2.6% | 4.3% | 0.5% | 2,946,600 | 2.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 2.4% | | 1.0% | 4.7% | 4.7% | | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.6% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 0.0% | -2.2% | -0.4% | | 2.0% | | 4.5% | 1.9% | -0.8% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 2.6% | 1.6% | 17.2% | 2,118 | 3.2% | 1,494 | 2.6% | 44.7% | 6.1% | 85.3% | 11.1% | 3.7% | 0.8% | -1.0% | 1.8% | . | Período del Estado Desarrollista de Bienestar Social (1924-1973) (Cifras se miden generalmente de 1929 a 1971) | Ibáñez, Alessandri Palma, Aguirre Cerda, Alessandri Rodríguez, Frei Montalva, Allende | 9,066,588 | 1.8% | 2,192,651 | 0.05% | 24% | -0.6% | -1.7% | 6,863,109 | 2.9% | 3,467,970 | 2.9% | 38.3% | 2,673,737 | 3.3% | 29.5% | 2,754,551_ € | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 10,838,683 | 3.1% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 3.1% | 4.7% | 18.7% | 5.4% | 7.7% | 6.9% | 8.5% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 3.3% | 4.9% | 7.6% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 2.7% | 0.2% | 4.3% | 5.5% | 1.9% | 0.4% | 2.9% | -3.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 3.1% | -0.4% | 21.7% | 3,268 | 1.0% | 3,321 | 1.9% | 26.2% | 2.1% | 81.9% | 10.4% | 7.7% | 2.1% | 3.0% | -0.9% | . | Período del Consenso de Washington (1973-2006) (Cifras se miden generalmente de 1971 a 2006) | Pinochet, Concertación | 16,432,674 | 1.7% | 2,160,220 | -0.04% | 13% | -0.3% | -1.6% | 14,272,454 | 2.1% | 6,535,682 | 1.8% | 39.8% | 4,904,715 | 1.7% | 29.8% | 6,799,006_ € | 2.6% | 2.1% | 3.9% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 1.6% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 40,555,828 | 3.8% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 0.5% | 3.2% | 2.1% | 3.3% | 4.6% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 1.2% | 1.1% | -0.1% | 3.5% | 5.7% | 1.9% | 0.0% | -2.5% | -0.3% | 2.5% | 5.4% | 5.9% | -2.3% | 6.7% | 1.5% | 5.9% | 0.1% | 5.1% | 0.5% | 9.0% | 42,223 | 7.6% | 26,536 | 6.1% | 38.0% | 0.3% | 57.5% | 9.1% | 33.3% | 4.1% | 3.9% | -0.5% | . | Principales ciclos económicos (medidos entre los años de máximo) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 607.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | 1884-1918 (3) | Santa María, Balmaceda, Régimen Parlamentario | 3,648,688 | 1.2% | 1,979,923 | 0.9% | 54% | -0.2% | -0.3% | 1,667,827 | 1.5% | 824,239 | 2.4% | 22.6% | 496,222 | 2.9% | 13.6% | 1,331,301_ € | 0.8% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 1.1% | -0.4% | 1.9% | 2.6% | 5.6% | 0.8% | 2,157,838 | 2.6% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 1.4% | | 1.0% | 4.7% | 4.7% | | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.6% | 8.2% | 5.3% | 0.0% | -2.2% | -0.4% | | 2.1% | | 2.6% | 2.5% | -3.0% | 4.9% | 4.3% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 17.5% | 1,469 | 3.2% | 877 | 1.9% | 48.2% | 4.8% | 86.9% | 10.3% | 2.8% | 1.1% | -0.5% | 1.7% | . | 1918-29 | Alessandri Palma (1920-24), Ibánez (1924-31) | 4,228,169 | 1.3% | 2,151,501 | 0.8% | 51% | -0.3% | -0.6% | 2,075,874 | 2.0% | 1,058,311 | 2.3% | 25.0% | 692,997 | 3.1% | 16.4% | 1,442,060_ € | 0.7% | 1.5% | -1.7% | 0.6% | 3.4% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 2.4% | 0.3% | -0.3% | 2,946,600 | 2.9% | 2.1% | 1.5% | 4.7% | 5.5% | | 7.5% | 10.3% | 8.0% | | 2.4% | 2.4% | 2.6% | -0.4% | -0.6% | 2.8% | 6.3% | 9.0% | 12.3% | 1.9% | | 10.5% | 0.3% | 6.4% | 1.2% | 3.9% | 2.4% | 6.2% | 4.8% | 16.8% | 2,118 | 3.4% | 1,494 | 5.0% | 41.2% | 7.3% | 83.6% | 11.9% | 4.6% | -0.2% | -2.4% | 2.3% | . | 1929-46 | Alessandri Palma (1931-38), Aguirre Cerda (38-40), Ríos (40-42) | 5,459,362 | 1.5% | 2,372,019 | 0.6% | 43% | -0.4% | -0.9% | 3,070,925 | 2.3% | 1,748,634 | 3.0% | 32.0% | 1,299,328 | 3.8% | 23.8% | 2,023,754_ € | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.4% | 1.2% | 1.7% | 3.3% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 0.5% | 3.0% | 4,246,618 | 2.2% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 3.6% | | 3.4% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 7.2% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 3.6% | 3.4% | 2.7% | -0.9% | 2.2% | -5.8% | 3.6% | 6.2% | 0.7% | 1.3% | -3.5% | -3.9% | -2.6% | 0.7% | -0.9% | -3.8% | 24.7% | 1,424 | -2.3% | 1,207 | -1.2% | 27.8% | 4.2% | 80.0% | 14.6% | 5.4% | -0.8% | 5.2% | -5.6% | . | 1946-58 | González Videla (1948-52), Ibánez (1952-58) | 6,983,947 | 2.1% | 2,349,502 | -0.1% | 34% | -0.8% | -2.1% | 4,616,494 | 3.5% | 2,436,699 | 2.8% | 34.9% | 1,859,825 | 3.0% | 26.6% | 2,337,779_ € | 1.2% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 5.3% | 1.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | 6,433,534 | 3.5% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 2.3% | 3.5% | | 5.5% | 5.0% | 4.0% | 7.1% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 9.0% | 0.4% | 1.3% | 2.4% | 6.8% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 2.2% | 1.1% | 6.6% | -2.1% | 1.8% | 2.8% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 13.9% | 1,397 | -0.2% | 1,681 | 2.8% | 24.7% | 1.1% | 80.7% | 11.1% | 8.3% | 4.3% | 2.1% | 2.2% | . | 1958-71 (4) | Alessandri Rodríguez (1958-64, Frei Montalva (1964-70), Allende (1970-73) | 9,066,588 | 2.0% | 2,192,651 | -0.5% | 24% | -0.7% | -2.5% | 6,863,109 | 3.1% | 3,467,970 | 2.8% | 38.3% | 2,673,737 | 2.8% | 29.5% | 2,754,551_ € | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.4% | -1.8% | -1.8% | 1.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 5.6% | 2.2% | 10,838,683 | 4.1% | 2.8% | 1.8% | 5.8% | 7.2% | 18.7% | 7.9% | 13.9% | 13.2% | 11.4% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 4.8% | 8.6% | 12.3% | 2.4% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 5.7% | 3.3% | -1.5% | 8.2% | -3.7% | 5.5% | 0.6% | 3.3% | 1.5% | 24.3% | 3,268 | 6.8% | 3,321 | 5.4% | 24.9% | 0.1% | 84.7% | 4.8% | 10.5% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 2.7% | . | 1971-81 (4) | Pinochet (1973-1989) | 11,102,531 | 2.0% | 2,029,263 | -0.8% | 18% | -0.6% | -2.8% | 9,060,881 | 2.8% | 4,560,920 | 2.8% | 41.1% | 3,581,676 | 3.0% | 32.3% | 3,600,184_ € | 2.7% | 2.1% | 4.5% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.3% | -0.5% | 6.0% | -0.6% | 5.4% | 13,585,241 | 2.3% | -0.4% | 0.7% | -2.0% | 0.7% | 0.4% | -2.6% | -1.6% | -7.1% | -0.3% | -0.4% | 0.9% | -1.3% | 5.0% | -2.7% | -1.5% | -6.2% | 4.1% | -5.0% | -0.4% | 3.5% | 4.3% | -3.2% | 9.0% | -2.2% | 2.0% | -6.7% | 7.2% | -2.2% | 11.6% | 4,886 | 4.1% | 9,319 | 10.9% | 34.9% | -2.8% | 71.7% | 5.5% | 22.8% | 8.5% | 13.3% | -4.3% | . | 1981-97 | Pinochet (1973-89), Concertación (1990-2006) | 14,796,076 | 1.8% | 2,150,466 | 0.4% | 15% | -0.2% | -1.2% | 12,645,610 | 2.1% | 6,045,677 | 1.8% | 40.9% | 4,761,377 | 1.8% | 32.2% | 5,654,760_ € | 2.9% | 2.4% | 4.0% | 2.2% | 0.5% | 3.7% | 5.3% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 2.3% | 29,629,982 | 5.0% | 2.1% | 3.3% | 1.3% | 4.2% | 5.6% | 6.3% | 7.3% | 5.2% | 4.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 7.4% | 1.1% | 1.4% | -7.7% | 3.8% | 4.3% | 6.4% | 7.4% | 1.2% | 7.2% | 1.9% | 6.3% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 1.5% | 10.2% | 15,150 | 8.9% | 17,671 | 3.9% | 36.7% | 0.2% | 54.0% | 11.7% | 34.2% | -0.4% | 0.7% | -0.4% | . | 1997-2006 (5) | Concertación (1990-2006) | 16,432,674 | 1.2% | 2,160,220 | 0.05% | 13% | -0.2% | -1.1% | 14,272,454 | 1.4% | 6,535,682 | 0.9% | 39.8% | 4,904,715 | 0.3% | 29.8% | 6,799,006_ € | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.9% | 0.8% | -0.3% | -0.5% | 1.2% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 40,555,828 | 3.5% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | 4.1% | | 5.1% | 6.0% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 1.7% | -0.3% | 3.7% | 7.2% | 1.9% | 0.7% | -4.6% | 0.2% | 2.4% | 5.9% | 5.2% | -7.9% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 10.0% | -2.2% | 4.9% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 42,223 | 12.1% | 26,536 | 4.6% | 43.0% | 3.0% | 48.4% | 9.3% | 42.3% | 7.5% | -0.3% | 3.5% | . | Variación total en el período (veces) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | Período del Estado Desarrollista de Bienestar Social (1924-1973) (Cifras se miden generalmente de 1929 a 1971) | | | 2.14 | | 1.02 | | | | | 3.31 | | 3.28 | | | 3.86 | | | 1.91 | 1.84 | 2.19 | 0.98 | 1.05 | 2.28 | 3.73 | 2.33 | 2.94 | 2.79 | | 3.68 | 1.95 | 1.72 | 3.54 | 6.76 | | 9.07 | 22.89 | 16.43 | 30.52 | 4.06 | | 3.95 | 7.54 | 21.79 | 2.25 | 1.92 | 3.03 | 1.09 | 5.80 | 9.32 | 2.21 | 1.16 | 3.29 | 0.24 | 1.60 | 1.69 | 3.64 | 0.85 | | | 1.54 | | 2.22 | | | | | | 2.40 | 3.51 | 0.68 | . | Período del Consenso de Washington (1973-2006) (Cifras se miden generalmente de 1971 a 2006) | | | 1.81 | | 0.99 | | | | | 2.08 | | 1.88 | | | 1.83 | | | 2.47 | 2.07 | 3.77 | 1.62 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 2.42 | 3.68 | 2.25 | 3.19 | | 3.74 | 1.53 | 2.06 | 1.21 | 2.99 | | 3.17 | 4.76 | 2.23 | 3.60 | 1.53 | | 0.97 | 3.31 | 6.95 | 1.91 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.90 | 2.35 | 6.38 | 7.55 | 0.44 | 9.76 | 1.66 | 7.34 | 1.03 | 5.62 | 1.21 | | | 12.92 | | 7.99 | | | | | | 4.10 | 3.79 | 0.83 | . | Variación total 1929-2006 (veces) | | | 3.89 | | 1.00 | | | | | 6.88 | | 6.18 | | | 7.08 | | | 4.71 | 3.81 | 8.26 | 1.59 | 1.12 | 4.01 | 9.02 | 8.57 | 6.61 | 8.91 | | 13.76 | 2.98 | 3.54 | 4.28 | 20.19 | | 28.71 | 108.92 | 36.69 | 109.99 | 6.21 | 6.38 | 3.84 | 24.97 | 151.42 | 4.30 | 1.93 | 1.25 | 0.97 | 13.63 | 59.45 | 16.67 | 0.51 | 32.09 | 0.40 | 11.71 | 1.74 | 20.44 | 1.03 | | | 19.93 | 17.76 | 17.76 | | | | | | 9.83 | 13.30 | 0.57 | . | Fuente: CENDA, en base a UC 2000, "Economía Chilena 1810-1995. Estadísticas Históricas (Lüders y otros)", INE, BC y Riesco (ed), LA A New Developmentalist Welfare State Model in the Making?, 2007, UNRISD-PalgraveMacmillan, London. Memoria de cálculos: Libro_2007.xls, Chile_Paper.xls, bajados de www.cep.cl el 16 Julio 2007. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | NOTAS: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (*) Por lo general, los datos del período oligarquico se miden desde 1884 a 1929, los del desarrollismo entre 1929 y 1971, y los del consenso de washington entre 1971 y 2006. Todos estos años corresponden a momento de "boom" del correspondiente ciclo económico, o cercanos a ello. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (1) Al 2005, las 5 ciudades principales eran Santiago (4,9 millones), Puente Alto (0,6), Concepción (0,4), Viña del Mar (0,33), y Valparaíso (0,28), esta última igualada ya por San Bernardo (0,28). En 1992, la segunda ciudad era Concepción (0,32) y Puente Alto (0,25) estaba en quinto lugar. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (2) En la definición tradicional, la ciudad de Santiago no incluye las comunas de Puente Alto ni Colina, las comunas de mayor crecimiento en el período (2,4 veces y 2,8 veces), ni San Bernardo (1,6 veces). El Gran Santiago, que incluye éstas, alcanzó en 2005 una población de 5,88 millones de habitantes. Su crecimiento en el período 1992-2005 (1,24 veces) fue todavía superior al de las 5 mayores ciudades (1,2 veces) y al de la población del país (1,19 veces). En otras palabras, durante la última década el Gran Santiago todavía continúa creciendo levemente más rápido que el país, e igual que el conkjunto de la población urbana (1,23 veces). | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (3) Los años 1884 y 1918 representan puntos de máximo, el último de los cuales es seguiido de una caída de 14% en el PIB en 1919. Sin embargo, en dicho período hay al menos dos ciclos económicos mayores, que alcanzan sus máximos en 1902 y 1913, seguidos en ambos casos por caísdas de más del 10% del PIB. Adicionalmente, se verifican numerosos ciclos económicos menores. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (4) El ciclo económico mayor que se inicia en 1958 en realidad alcanza su máximo en 1972, lo cual se comprueba con la mayor parte de las cifras oficiales de PIB, empleo, producción, etc.. Sin embargo, las cifras de la UC consignan una caída del producto ese año. Por este motivo, se ha preferido escoger el año 1971 como año "peak" de dicho ciclo. Sin embargo, para comparaciones de gasto público, matrículas, y otras, se toman las cifras de 1972 o 1973 como término de este ciclo e inicio del otro. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (5) El ciclo económico mayor iniciado en 1997 se haya todavía en curso. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (6) Para la actividad huelguística se consideran como ciclios los siguientes períodos: 1961-1973, 1974-1989, 1990-1998. Los datos del período desarrollista abarcan de 1961-1973, y el consenso de Washiington desde 1974 a 1998. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (7) Hasta 1995 calculadas por Jofré, Luders y Wagner, 1999. UC, Tabla 5.2. !995-2006 estimadas en 5%. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | . | (8) Para transformar los dólares de 1995 a pesos de ese año se utiza el tipo de cambio promedio de 1995,que fue 396.773 pesos por dólar. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|