.

Walk to Work, 50 Cities with The Most Workers Age 16 and Over, by Percentage

.

2005 American Community Survey

.

.

RankCityWorkers 16+Walk to WorkPercentage

.

1Boston, Massachusetts253,20131,76912.5%

.

2Washington, District of Columbia249,86524,90510.0%

.

3San Francisco, California381,92236,6299.6%

.

4New York, New York3,429,194323,7129.4%

.

5Philadelphia, Pennsylvania537,23343,2598.1%

.

6Honolulu CDP, Hawaii173,65612,0046.9%

.

7Seattle, Washington301,70420,7376.9%

.

8Minneapolis, Minnesota189,29411,0045.8%

.

9Chicago, Illinois1,162,55063,5805.5%

.

10Baltimore, Maryland254,90813,8195.4%

.

11Denver, Colorado270,02512,9674.8%

.

12Portland, Oregon257,51011,0764.3%

.

13Milwaukee, Wisconsin224,6829,5864.3%

.

14New Orleans, Louisiana177,3517,4794.2%

.

15Sacramento, California188,5636,9053.7%

.

16Atlanta, Georgia186,7566,0683.2%

.

17Los Angeles, California1,662,23852,4163.2%

.

18Tucson, Arizona233,5267,2563.1%

.

19Oakland, California164,1694,8983.0%

.

20Detroit, Michigan265,8526,7592.5%

.

21Colorado Springs, Colorado184,5344,6612.5%

.

22Kansas City, Missouri216,0294,7962.2%

.

23Albuquerque, New Mexico238,2075,1732.2%

.

24Omaha, Nebraska186,5563,9522.1%

.

25Mesa, Arizona196,7314,0832.1%

.

26El Paso, Texas218,7224,5312.1%

.

27Memphis, Tennessee279,0915,5082.0%

.

28Tulsa, Oklahoma175,4833,4402.0%

.

29Wichita, Kansas167,2773,1701.9%

.

30San Diego, California578,63110,9381.9%

.

31Indianapolis, Indiana355,7646,7221.9%

.

32Nashville, Tennessee257,2364,8151.9%

.

33Houston, Texas875,25216,3571.9%

.

34Jacksonville, Florida354,2696,5451.8%

.

35Dallas, Texas533,3719,6751.8%

.

36Long Beach, California208,8873,7661.8%

.

37Las Vegas, Nevada252,0024,5411.8%

.

38Austin, Texas354,4166,3741.8%

.

39Raleigh, North Carolina172,1162,9131.7%

.

40Fresno, California185,7253,0941.7%

.

41Columbus, Ohio336,9645,5281.6%

.

42Phoenix, Arizona662,24210,7301.6%

.

43Charlotte, North Carolina298,6014,7621.6%

.

44Virginia Beach, Virginia220,1743,4291.6%

.

45San Jose, California402,2536,1311.5%

.

46San Antonio, Texas527,3817,8731.5%

.

47Louisville, Kentucky246,9663,4261.4%

.

48Oklahoma City, Oklahoma243,1493,3161.4%

.

49Fort Worth, Texas276,2133,0041.1%

.

50Arlington, Texas167,4521,4250.9%

.

.

.

.

.

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see
Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.

.

.

NOTE. Data are limited to the household population and exclude the population living in institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Survey Methodology.