.

Work at Home, 50 Cities with The Most Workers Age 16 and Over, by Percentage

.

2005 American Community Survey

.

.

RankCityWorkers 16+Work at HomePercentage

.

1San Francisco, California381,92224,1416.3%

.

2Portland, Oregon257,51013,6995.3%

.

3Seattle, Washington301,70415,4035.1%

.

4Austin, Texas354,41617,7645.0%

.

5Colorado Springs, Colorado184,5348,9934.9%

.

6Atlanta, Georgia186,7568,8134.7%

.

7Los Angeles, California1,662,23878,3824.7%

.

8Denver, Colorado270,02512,7024.7%

.

9San Diego, California578,63126,4034.6%

.

10Washington, District of Columbia249,86511,1104.4%

.

11Sacramento, California188,5638,2004.3%

.

12Oakland, California164,1696,8934.2%

.

13Charlotte, North Carolina298,60112,1144.1%

.

14Long Beach, California208,8878,2403.9%

.

15Raleigh, North Carolina172,1166,7793.9%

.

16Mesa, Arizona196,7317,3223.7%

.

17Fresno, California185,7256,7903.7%

.

18New Orleans, Louisiana177,3516,4513.6%

.

19Albuquerque, New Mexico238,2078,6083.6%

.

20New York, New York3,429,194123,6393.6%

.

21Honolulu CDP, Hawaii173,6566,2263.6%

.

22Tucson, Arizona233,5268,3623.6%

.

23Kansas City, Missouri216,0297,6633.5%

.

24Dallas, Texas533,37118,7103.5%

.

25Nashville, Tennessee257,2369,0153.5%

.

26Phoenix, Arizona662,24223,1763.5%

.

27Wichita, Kansas167,2775,8103.5%

.

28San Jose, California402,25313,4253.3%

.

29Omaha, Nebraska186,5566,2133.3%

.

30Las Vegas, Nevada252,0028,0443.2%

.

31San Antonio, Texas527,38116,2503.1%

.

32Virginia Beach, Virginia220,1746,4722.9%

.

33Minneapolis, Minnesota189,2945,5502.9%

.

34Arlington, Texas167,4524,8932.9%

.

35Oklahoma City, Oklahoma243,1497,0992.9%

.

36Boston, Massachusetts253,2017,3612.9%

.

37Chicago, Illinois1,162,55033,5202.9%

.

38Indianapolis, Indiana355,7649,9232.8%

.

39Columbus, Ohio336,9649,2672.8%

.

40Houston, Texas875,25223,9422.7%

.

41Fort Worth, Texas276,2137,4352.7%

.

42Detroit, Michigan265,8527,0512.7%

.

43Philadelphia, Pennsylvania537,23314,1592.6%

.

44Tulsa, Oklahoma175,4834,5462.6%

.

45Baltimore, Maryland254,9086,2332.4%

.

46Jacksonville, Florida354,2698,4132.4%

.

47Milwaukee, Wisconsin224,6825,3122.4%

.

48Louisville, Kentucky246,9665,1712.1%

.

49El Paso, Texas218,7224,4942.1%

.

50Memphis, Tennessee279,0914,7671.7%

.

.

.

.

.

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see
Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.

.

.

NOTE. Data are limited to the household population and exclude the population living in institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Survey Methodology.