.

Bike To Work, 50 Cities with The Most Workers Age 16 and Over, by Percentage

.

2005 American Community Survey

.

.

RankCityWorkers 16+BicyclePercentage

.

1Portland, Oregon257,5108,9423.5%

.

2Minneapolis, Minnesota189,2944,5892.4%

.

3Seattle, Washington301,7046,9632.3%

.

4Tucson, Arizona233,5265,2302.2%

.

5San Francisco, California381,9227,0531.8%

.

6Sacramento, California188,5633,3051.8%

.

7Washington, District of Columbia249,8654,3361.7%

.

8Oakland, California164,1692,5291.5%

.

9Honolulu CDP, Hawaii173,6562,5041.4%

.

10Denver, Colorado270,0253,8141.4%

.

11Austin, Texas354,4164,6541.3%

.

12New Orleans, Louisiana177,3511,7121.0%

.

13Boston, Massachusetts253,2012,3770.9%

.

14Philadelphia, Pennsylvania537,2334,7780.9%

.

15Albuquerque, New Mexico238,2071,9180.8%

.

16Mesa, Arizona196,7311,4850.8%

.

17Chicago, Illinois1,162,5507,8120.7%

.

18Fresno, California185,7251,2180.7%

.

19Columbus, Ohio336,9642,1310.6%

.

20San Diego, California578,6313,6020.6%

.

21Long Beach, California208,8871,2610.6%

.

22Phoenix, Arizona662,2423,9400.6%

.

23Los Angeles, California1,662,2389,8210.6%

.

24Colorado Springs, Colorado184,5341,0880.6%

.

25Milwaukee, Wisconsin224,6821,2900.6%

.

26Virginia Beach, Virginia220,1741,2300.6%

.

27Atlanta, Georgia186,7569550.5%

.

28New York, New York3,429,19416,4680.5%

.

29San Jose, California402,2531,6220.4%

.

30Baltimore, Maryland254,9081,0180.4%

.

31Las Vegas, Nevada252,0028660.3%

.

32El Paso, Texas218,7227000.3%

.

33Raleigh, North Carolina172,1165400.3%

.

34Houston, Texas875,2522,4680.3%

.

35Louisville, Kentucky246,9666580.3%

.

36Tulsa, Oklahoma175,4834560.3%

.

37Arlington, Texas167,4524330.3%

.

38Jacksonville, Florida354,2698990.3%

.

39Fort Worth, Texas276,2136450.2%

.

40Detroit, Michigan265,8525470.2%

.

41Dallas, Texas533,3711,0290.2%

.

42Nashville, Tennessee257,2364480.2%

.

43Oklahoma City, Oklahoma243,1494220.2%

.

44Charlotte, North Carolina298,6014810.2%

.

45San Antonio, Texas527,3816690.1%

.

46Omaha, Nebraska186,5562170.1%

.

47Wichita, Kansas167,2771930.1%

.

48Indianapolis, Indiana355,7643460.1%

.

49Memphis, Tennessee279,0912140.1%

.

50Kansas City, Missouri216,029500.0%

.

.

.

.

.

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see
Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.

.

NOTE. Data are limited to the household population and exclude the population living in institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Survey Methodology.