.

Carpoolers, 50 Cities with The Most Workers Age 16 and Over, by Percentage

.

2005 American Community Survey

.

.

.

NOTE. Data are limited to the household population and exclude the population living in institutions, college dormitories, and other group quarters. For information on confidentiality protection, sampling error, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Survey Methodology.

.

.

Workers 16+CarpooledPercentage

.

1Mesa, Arizona196,73132,85516.7%

.

2Phoenix, Arizona662,242107,53816.2%

.

3Sacramento, California188,56329,63515.7%

.

4Honolulu CDP, Hawaii173,65627,10315.6%

.

5Fresno, California185,72528,01515.1%

.

6Dallas, Texas533,37177,85914.6%

.

7Tucson, Arizona233,52633,29214.3%

.

8Houston, Texas875,252121,89513.9%

.

9Charlotte, North Carolina298,60140,67413.6%

.

10Fort Worth, Texas276,21337,33213.5%

.

11Minneapolis, Minnesota189,29424,27712.8%

.

12Albuquerque, New Mexico238,20730,37112.7%

.

13Oklahoma City, Oklahoma243,14930,80412.7%

.

14San Jose, California402,25349,86012.4%

.

15New Orleans, Louisiana177,35121,53612.1%

.

16San Antonio, Texas527,38162,82711.9%

.

17Jacksonville, Florida354,26941,79811.8%

.

18Oakland, California164,16919,23711.7%

.

19Los Angeles, California1,662,238193,66211.7%

.

20Raleigh, North Carolina172,11619,98411.6%

.

21El Paso, Texas218,72224,11911.0%

.

22Baltimore, Maryland254,90827,73310.9%

.

23Austin, Texas354,41638,26910.8%

.

24Long Beach, California208,88722,45310.7%

.

25Indianapolis, Indiana355,76438,19110.7%

.

26Colorado Springs, Colorado184,53419,80410.7%

.

27Chicago, Illinois1,162,550124,48110.7%

.

28Denver, Colorado270,02528,69810.6%

.

29Milwaukee, Wisconsin224,68223,72710.6%

.

30Memphis, Tennessee279,09129,17510.5%

.

31Portland, Oregon257,51026,69610.4%

.

32Seattle, Washington301,70431,22310.3%

.

33Las Vegas, Nevada252,00225,52410.1%

.

34Nashville, Tennessee257,23626,00110.1%

.

35Arlington, Texas167,45216,91210.1%

.

36Virginia Beach, Virginia220,17422,15010.1%

.

37Detroit, Michigan265,85226,67410.0%

.

38Philadelphia, Pennsylvania537,23353,65610.0%

.

39Omaha, Nebraska186,55618,61610.0%

.

40San Diego, California578,63154,8349.5%

.

41Atlanta, Georgia186,75617,2539.2%

.

42Wichita, Kansas167,27715,3569.2%

.

43Tulsa, Oklahoma175,48316,1049.2%

.

44Columbus, Ohio336,96429,9808.9%

.

45Louisville, Kentucky246,96621,7958.8%

.

46San Francisco, California381,92231,6598.3%

.

47Kansas City, Missouri216,02917,4678.1%

.

48Washington, District of Columbia249,86519,2467.7%

.

49Boston, Massachusetts253,20118,4697.3%

.

50New York, New York3,429,194208,5156.1%

.

.

.

.

.

Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see
Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.