| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
. | *0359 | 25 | 25 | | | 25 | | 25 | | | | 80 | 100 | 140 | 125 | | | | |
. | *0753 | 25 | 15 | 40 | | 25 | | 25 | | | | 80 | 100 | 140 | 100 | | | | |
. | *0833 | 25 | 0 | | | 15 | | 25 | | | | | 100 | 140 | 120 | | | | |
. | *0847 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 115 | 25 | 25 | | 350 | 90 | 100 | 150 | 135 | 825 | 91.67% | 3.90 | Generic abstracts do not show how material related to this paper; citation errors (lack of URLs); insufficient (6) scholarly sources. |
. | *1185 | 25 | 25 | 45 | 75 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 45 | | 390 | 90 | 100 | 150 | 165 | 895 | 99.44% | 4.00 | Minor citation errors throughout; abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *1421 | 25 | 20 | | 75 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 50 | | 395 | 100 | 100 | 150 | 190 | 935 | 103.89% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *1432 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 65 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 50 | | 390 | 100 | 100 | 150 | 165 | 905 | 100.56% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *2177 | 25 | 25 | | | 25 | | 25 | | | | 80 | 100 | 130 | 125 | | | | |
. | *2265 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 70 | 20 | 120 | 25 | 40 | | 365 | 80 | 100 | 150 | 205 | 900 | 100.00% | 4.00 | Minor citation errors; only 9 academic/scholarly sources; abstracts clearly link to research |
. | *2680 | 25 | 25 | 45 | 65 | 20 | 110 | 25 | 40 | | 355 | 90 | 100 | 150 | 230 | 925 | 102.78% | 4.00 | Minor grammatical and citation errors; abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient academic/scholarly sources |
. | *4478 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 65 | 15 | 115 | 25 | 25 | | 330 | 80 | 100 | 150 | 205 | 865 | 96.11% | 4.00 | Annotations informal but, in the main, link to the paper; citation errors (databases, retrieve dates, formatting); insufficient (6) scholarly sources. |
. | *4485 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 115 | 25 | 50 | | 375 | 80 | 100 | 150 | 165 | 870 | 96.67% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *6520 | 25 | 15 | 40 | | 25 | | 25 | | | | 80 | 100 | 140 | 150 | | | | |
. | *6816 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 50 | | 395 | 90 | 100 | 150 | 165 | 900 | 100.00% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *7015 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 75 | 25 | 115 | 25 | 25 | | 350 | 90 | 100 | 150 | 165 | 855 | 95.00% | 4.00 | Over-reliance on wikipedia (10/30) and general (not specific content page) website links (9/30) ; insufficient (only 5 of 10 required) scholarly sources |
. | *7282 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 75 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 45 | | 380 | 100 | 100 | 150 | 180 | 910 | 101.11% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources; missing info on databases used to access journal articles |
. | *7405 | 25 | 15 | 50 | 60 | 25 | 115 | 25 | 50 | | 365 | 70 | 100 | 140 | 185 | 860 | 95.56% | 4.00 | Abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *7449 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 75 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 45 | | 390 | 70 | 100 | 150 | 175 | 885 | 98.33% | 4.00 | Minor citation style issues; abstracts clearly link to paper; sufficient scholarly sources |
. | *7458 | 25 | 15 | 45 | 70 | 25 | 125 | 25 | 40 | | 370 | 80 | 100 | 130 | 190 | 870 | 96.67% | 4.00 | Minor citation errors; abstracts well-written but do not clearly link to research |
. | *8501 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 60 | 15 | 95 | 25 | 20 | | 305 | 90 | 100 | 140 | 170 | 805 | 89.44% | 3.70 | Annotations missing; citation errors throughout; generic abstracts do not clarify how resource used in paper. |