.

.

.

.

Technology Educator of the Year Rubric

.

.

.

.

This award recognizes outstanding educators from C.I.I. Member and C.I.I. Service Participant schools and divisions who
effectively use technology with students.

.

.

.

Exemplary
(4 points)
Strong
(3 points)
Adequate
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Not Apparent
(0 points)

.

Work reflects the mission and purpose of the C.I.I.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been satisfactory.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been limited.Work of improving student achievement through technology is not evident.

.

Shows effective use of technology.Provides a clear and complete description of a lesson or unit showing effective use of technology that is a model for duplication.Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing effective use of technology.Provides a clear description of a lesson or unit showing satisfactory use of technology.Provides a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.Does not provide a description of a lesson or unit showing use of technology.

.

Shows the impact of the technology on students.Unit or lesson shows a significant increase (with measurable results) in learning due to the use of technology.Unit or lesson shows an effective increase in learning (with measurable results) due to the use of technology.Unit or lesson shows a moderate increase in learning due to the use of technology.Unit or lesson shows an increase in learning due to the use of technology.Work lacks evidence that there is an increase in learning due to the use of technology.

.

Shows the impact on the community, and/or profession.Work has had a significant positive impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Work has had an effective impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work has had a satisfactory impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work has had a limited impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work lacks evidence of its impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.