.

.

.

.

Technology Administrator of the Year Rubric

.

.

.

.

This award recognizes outstanding administrators from C.I.I. member and C.I.I. Service Participant schools and divisions who have effectively increased the use of technology within their school.

.

.

.

Exemplary
(4 points)
Strong
(3 points)
Adequate
(2 points)
Weak
(1 point)
Not Apparent
(0 points)

.

Work reflects the mission and purpose of the C.I.I.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been effective.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been satisfactory.Work of improving student achievement through technology has been limited.Work of improving student achievement through technology is not evident.

.

Has made a noteworthy contribution to promoting educational technology within his/her school.Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been effective and worthy of being imitated or modeled.Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been effective.Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been satisfactory. Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school have been limited.Contributions to promoting educational technology within his/her school is not evident.

.

Shows the impact on the community, and/or profession.Work has had a significant positive impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide and is worthy of being imitated or modeledWork has had an effective impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work has had a satisfactory impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work has had a limited impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.Work lacks evidence of its impact on technology use in education; locally, regionally and/or statewide.

.

Demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.Effectively demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Effectively demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.Satisfactorily demonstrates exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning.Demonstration of exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning is limited.Demonstration of exceptional leadership in finding ways that technology benefits teaching and learning is not evident.

.

Demonstrates a commitment to professional growth.Effectively demonstrates a commitment to professional growth and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Effectively demonstrates a commitment to professional growth.Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is satisfactory.Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is limited.Demonstration of a commitment to professional growth is not apparent.

.

Demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education.Effectively demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education and is worthy of being imitated or modeled.Effectively demonstrates creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education.Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is satisfactory.Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is limited.Demonstration of creativity and innovation in dealing with issues and problems facing public education is not evident